|
The methodology used
in this project is threefold: Qualitative and quantitative
studies and heuristic procedures (in the form of workshops).
For the qualitative studies
we use focus group interviews (FGI) and in-depth
interviews. FGI is an interview with a small group
of people on a specific topic. The focus group interview is
not a discussion, nor a problem-solving session and not a
decision making group. It is an interview. In general, focus
groups are conducted with people who do not know each other.
The FGIs should deliver the concepts that are relevant from
the perspectives of the senior citizens on the one hand and
of the decision makers and experts on the other. As a completion
of the qualitative approach, an elaboration of the concepts
resulting from the FGI is necessary. This is best done with
the help of narrative interviews (in-depth interviews). Their
goal is to complete the range of arguments which have been
collected in the FGI and to better specify and understand
points of view about problems in today’s mobility.
The standardised
study has the function to quantify the materials
derived from the qualitative methods, and to arrive at a quantitative
empirical representation. With respect to the quantitative
part of the project, the focus group interviews and the in
depth interviews have the function of elaborating patterns
and types of need dispositions, attitudes and every day practices
concerning life quality and mobility aspects. The standardised
interviews will open an opportunity to analyse the frequency
distribution of the relevant variables and their interrelations
by applying complex procedures of data. The field work is
done by professional institutes, and raw data will be delivered
to the respective consortium partners, who will do the statistical
analysis. The standardised interviews are carried out in every
participant country to get the possibility for a comparative
control of the results on the one hand, and on the other hand
for the reason that in the end the results of this project
are arguments for political decisions. To minimise the artefacts
during the data collection and interpretation, for example
because of translation problems, it is necessary to pre-test
the standardised instrument before a larger sample will be
interviewed. As far as representativity is concerned we see
to it that the institutes which will carry out the statistical
survey act according to the routines of empirical social research.
The third important part
of work, besides qualitative and quantitative methods for
the collection of verbal data is the heuristic part,
represented by the workshops that we have planned. Due to
the fact that there is a lack of knowledge and know-how (between
different disciplines and different countries) on how to implement
certain results in the traffic and mobility area, the amount
of work and of resistance to be met with implementation is
often assessed erroneously, there are ideological barriers
based on misunderstandings and prejudices (e.g., cost-benefit
relations in connection with elderly road users, etc .). According
to our knowledge, there are no other methods to overcome these
problems than “to work together”: Organisation
psychology bases methods for solutions of the problems just
mentioned on for example rules of group dynamics, the social-psychological
principles of active rehearsal, communication principles (improved
acceptance of messages due to better understanding and appreciation
of the sender), etc. All this can be elaborated on better
in the course of the project with the help of workshops.
The workshops are also essential for the dissemination of
results in a deeper sense, viz. in order to get support of
relevant actors in connection with implementation. They are
the most likely part of the work to have effects on the future,
as new networks and alliances will emerge, as experiences
about communication with each others will develop, etc. The
workshops are also the main agent to bind the senior citizens
associations to the project and to motivate and help them
act efficiently as representatives of elderly citizens.

Home
| The Project
| Workplan
| Methodology
| Consortium
| Results | Conference
05 | Conference
06 | Contact
|